IEEE 2026 NSS MIC RTSD

Please note! All times in the online program are given in Madrid - Europe (CET) times!

Madrid - Europe ()
Oct 23, 2026, 5:59:42 PM
Your time ()
n/a
Madrid - Europe ()
Oct 23, 2026, 5:59:42 PM
Our Sponsors:

To search for a specific ID please enter the hash sign followed by the ID number (e.g. #123).

Simulation and modeling of medical imaging systems (2)

Session chair: Nitta, Munetaka, (Ludwig Maximillian University Munich, Garching, Germany); Sarrut, David, Dr. (CNRS - CREATIS - CLB, CREATIS - Radiotherapy department, Villeurbanne, France)
 
Shortcut: MIC-16
Date: Friday, 13 November, 2026, 17:30 - 19:00
Location: FEDERICO GARCÍA LORCA
Session type: MIC Session

Contents

Click on an contribution to preview the abstract content.

The underlined authors are the presenters. The authors in bold are the main authors.

17:30 MIC-16-01

How well do we know non-collinearity in PET? A simulation and a new analysis of past and recent experiments (#2250)

A. Espinosa1, P. Galve2, 1, L. M. Fraile1, 3, J.L. Herraiz1, J.M. Udias1

1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Grupo de Física Nuclear, EMFTEL & IPARCOS, Madrid, Spain
2 Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Institute for Physical and Information Technologies “Leonardo Torres Quevedo”, ITEFI, Madrid, Spain
3 CERN, ISOLDE, EP Department, Geneva, Genève, Switzerland

Abstract

Positron-electron non-collinearity of the 511 keV annihilation-photon has been derived from several experiments. In the one hand, of the (anti-)correlation between Doppler broadening induced by the transverse momentum component of the annihilating pair, and photon non-collinearity. Direct non-colinearity measurements with pin-hole or slits provide also noncolinearity information. In the past, discrepancies in the non-collinearity derived from both kinds of experiments have arised, and the non-collinearity value generally accepted has been solely derived from Doppler broadening experiments. To better understand non-collinearity, we review  the correlation between the  kinematics of the initial electron-positron pair and the emitted non-collinear photon. We then use a detailed 3D simulation of the kinematics annihilation of the e-e+ pair, including the motion of the initial pair of leptons, which in turns introduces the energy broadening of the 511 keV peak, and the non-collinearity of the final photons,  linked to the underlying electron kinetic-energy distribution. To this end, initial electron kinetic energies are sampled from a semi-Gaussian distribution, while initial electron directions are sampled isotropically. We fit the initial kinetic energy distribution of the electron-positron pairs to reproduce, after the detailed 3D simulation, the observables in each kind of experiments, either Doppler broadening or actual non-collinearity in slit experiments. We find that the same initial electron kinetic energy distribution explains both Doppler broadening and accurate slit experiments in water at room temperature. Finally, we compare our extraction for non-collinearity distribution, and found it similar to the one presented by Tuoissant et al in 2024, confirming that non-collinearity is being underestimated in most MC simulations of PET scanners.

Acknowledgment

Supported by the European Innovation Council RETIMAGER (101099096), by the Spanish Government JDC2023-051754-I (P. Galve)

References
[1] Mogensen, O. E., & Eldrup, M. (1978). Vacancies in pure ice studied by positron annihilation techniques. Journal of Glaciology, 21(85), 85-99.
[2] Iwata, K., Greaves, R. G., & Surko, C. M. (1997). γ-ray spectra from positron annihilation on atoms and molecules. Physical Review A, 55(5), 3586.
[3] Toussaint, M., Loignon-Houle, F., Auger, É., Lapointe, G., Dussault, J. P., & Lecomte, R. (2024). On the implementation of acollinearity in PET Monte Carlo simulations. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 69(18), 18NT01.
[4] Shibuya, K., Yoshida, E., Nishikido, F., Suzuki, T., Tsuda, T., Inadama, N., ... & Murayama, H. (2007). Limit of spatial resolution in FDG-PET due to annihilation photon non-collinearity. In World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2006: August 27–September 1, 2006 COEX Seoul, Korea “Imaging the Future Medicine” (pp. 1667-1671). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Shibuya, K., Yoshida, E., Nishikido, F., Suzuki, T., Tsuda, T., Inadama, N., ... & Murayama, H. (2007). Annihilation photon acollinearity in PET: volunteer and phantom FDG studies. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 52(17), 5249.
 
Keywords: non-colinearity, PET, Doppler broadening, Monte Carlo simulation
17:45 MIC-16-02

PAL-G4: A Geant4-based code with PAL parametrisation (#2072)

N. Castellanos1, D. Niekaemper2, W. Ramírez1, L. Tellmann2, J. Scheins2, G. Llosá1, C. Lerche2, A. Ros1

1 Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (CSIC-UV), Valencia, Spain
2 Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 4, Jülich, Germany

Abstract

Positron Annihilation Lifetime has previously been demonstrated to provide useful information in PET imaging. Due to the fact that the annihilation time depends on the tissue where the annihilation occurs, to disentangle the different times for heterogeneous tumors is extremely challenging. Geant4, the toolkit for the simulation of the passage of particles through matter developed at CERN, has been shown to be a good candidate for medical physics simulations. The main drawback is that Geant4 code does not include Positron Annihilation Lifetime information in the source code. The IRIS group at IFIC (Valencia) has developed PAL-G4, an unofficial version of Geant4 that introduces the possibility to add measured Positron Annihilation Lifetimes for different materials in order to be able to simulate realistic scenarios. In order to test the PAL-G4 code, the BrainPET-7T insert for magnetic resonance at the PET-physics group at the Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH was simulated. Two cases were simulated, one in which the annihilation took place in a homogeneous medium, and another in a heterogeneous medium. The simulation results fit the expected behavior in terms of the detected annihilation times in both cases, thereby showing the suitability of using PAL-G4 for real case studies. Further measurements of annihilation times for various sources and tissues of interest in medical applications will be measured with the BrainPET-7T and used as input parameters for the PAL-G4 code. The simulations results will be compared with the measured data in all cases.

AcknowledgmentThis work was supported in part by and the SO project CEX2023-001292-S funded by MCIU/AEI and the JAE Intro2024 (JAEINT24_EX_1518) grant.
References
[1] Takyu S. et al., Applied Physics Express, 2022, vol. 15, no 10, p. 106001.
[2] Alkhorayef M. et al., Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 2021, vol. 188, p.109690.
[3] Avachat V. et al., Scientific reports, 2024, vol. 14, no 1, p. 21155.
[4] Tashima H. et al., 2023 IEEE NSS MIC RTSD, IEEE, 2023. p. 1-1.
[5] Moskal P. et al., Physics in Medicine & Biology, 2019, vol. 64, no 5, p.055017.
[6] Niekämper D. et al., 2024 IEEE NSS MIC RTSD, IEEE, 2024. p. 1-1.
Keywords: Positronium, Annihilation Lifetime, PET, heterogeneous medium, source code
18:00 MIC-16-03

Data-Driven System Response Modeling for SPECT via Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) of Directional Penetration Maps from Experimental Sparse Scanning Data (#2923)

Y. Jin1, S. Mandot1, L.-J. Meng1, 2

1 University of Illinois at Urbana and Champaign, Department of Nuclear, Plasma, and Radiological Engineering, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America
2 University of Illinois at Urbana and Champaign, Beckman Institute for Advance Science and Technology, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America

Abstract

Accurate system response modeling is essential for quantitative SPECT, but system response functions (SRFs) generated from nominal collimator geometry can deviate from the response of the actual system due to aperture imperfections, mechanical misalignment, and septal penetration. This mismatch is especially significant for a non-conventional aperture. We propose a data-driven SRF modeling method that reconstructs a directional penetration map from sparse point-source scans. In the proposed aperture-domain representation, each source-detector measurement is indexed by its aperture crossing position and ray direction, allowing measurements from different source locations and detector pixels to be pooled into a shared position-direction map. The map represents the effective material path length, which is estimated by maximum likelihood under a Poisson model with latent detector-depth sublayers, and the resulting problem is solved using an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. SRFs for arbitrary source locations can then be generated through the ray-tracing method by combining geometric factors with the learned path length and the photon-energy-dependent attenuation coefficient. Preliminary Geant4 validation using a 16-aperture micro-ring CZT-based SPECT model with controlled collimator tilting demonstrates that scan-based SRFs recover aperture-level response features missed by nominal-design SRFs and agree more closely with the ground-truth tilted-collimator response at non-scanned source positions. Experimental validation on the clinical AlphaSPECT system and image-domain evaluation will be presented at the conference.

AcknowledgmentThis work was supported by the National Institutes of Health under grant numbers R01HL145786 (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute) and U01EB031798 (National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering).
References
[1] T. Li, E. C. I. Ao, B. Lambert, B. Brans, S. Vandenberghe, and G. S. P. Mok, “Quantitative Imaging for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy Dosimetry - Technical Review,” Theranostics, vol. 7, no. 18, pp. 4551–4565, 2017, doi: 10.7150/thno.19782.
[2] S. Y. Chun, J. A. Fessler, and Y. K. Dewaraja, “Correction for Collimator-Detector Response in SPECT Using Point Spread Function Template,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 295–305, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2225441.
[3] Z. El Bitar, R. H. Huesman, R. Buchko, V. Bekaert, D. Brasse, and G. T. Gullberg, “A detector response function design in pinhole SPECT including geometrical calibration,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 2395–2411, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/7/2395.
[4] X. Song, W. P. Segars, Y. Du, B. M. Tsui, and E. C. Frey, “Fast modelling of the collimator-detector response in Monte Carlo simulation of SPECT imaging using the angular response function,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1791–1804, 2005, doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/8/011.
[5] B. W. Miller, R. Van Holen, H. H. Barrett, and L. R. Furenlid, “A System Calibration and Fast Iterative Reconstruction Method for Next-Generation SPECT Imagers,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1990–1996, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1109/TNS.2012.2198243.
[6] X. Lai, E. M. Zannoni, J. George, and L.-J. Meng, “System modeling and evaluation of a prototype inverted-compound eye gamma camera for the second generation MR compatible SPECT,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip., vol. 954, p. 162046, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2019.04.001.
[7] E. M. Zannoni, C. Yang, and L.-J. Meng, “Design Study of an Ultrahigh Resolution Brain SPECT System Using a Synthetic Compound-Eye Camera Design With Micro-Slit and Micro-Ring Apertures,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 3711–3727, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TMI.2021.3096920.
Keywords: SPECT, system modeling, MLE, EM algorithm, collimator penetration
18:15 MIC-16-04

Wasserstein Pullback Metric for Intrinsic Difficulty of Scintillation Detector Inverse Problems (#2265)

S. Bae1, 2, J.S. Lee1, 3

1 Seoul National University Graduate School, Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2 Seoul National University Graduate School, Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3 Seoul National University Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Scintillation detector inverse problems are limited by how sensitively photon distributions change with interaction or detector conditions. We propose a likelihood-free Wasserstein-geometric framework for quantifying this distributional sensitivity using a pretrained generative model for scintillation photon transport. By representing conditional photon distributions as pushforwards of a latent distribution, the Jacobian of the transport map induces a Wasserstein pullback metric on the condition space. We use the trace of this metric as a local sensitivity measure and its detector-level average as the expected distributional sensitivity (EDS). The proposed sensitivity captures DOI and crystal-dependent timing trends, correlates monotonically with interaction localization error across crystal dimensions (Spearman ρ=-0.88 for rough Teflon and -0.90 for polished ESR), and supports differentiable detector optimization. These results suggest that Wasserstein sensitivity can provide an estimator-independent measure of inverse-problem difficulty and a tool for detector characterization and optimization.

References
[1] Bae, S, Gong, K & Lee, JS 2025, ‘Fast and Differentiable Optical Photon Transport for Scintillation Detectors Using Flow Matching’, 2025 IEEE NSS-MIC-RTSD, IEEE.
[2] Peyré, G & Cuturi, M 2019, ‘Computational optimal transport: With applications to data science’, Now Foundations and Trends.
Keywords: Scintillation Detector, Differentiable Simulation, Wasserstein Geometry, Inverse Problems, Generative Modeling
18:30 MIC-16-05

Zero-Knowledge Calibration: PET Geometry Recovery from Unlocalized Point Sources (#2333)

T. Freye1, J. Thull1, Y. Kuhl1, V. Schulz1, 2

1 RWTH Aachen University, Chair of Imaging & Computer Vision, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
2 Hyperion Hybrid Imaging Systems, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Abstract

Mechanical detector misalignments in positron emission tomography (PET) scanners, caused by manufacturing tolerances as well as mechanical and thermal stress, lead to inaccurate line of response (LOR) positioning and consequently degrade image quality and quantitative accuracy. Existing calibration methods typically rely on dedicated measurements with known tracer distributions, requiring either calibration phantoms or precisely positioned point sources. These procedures are time-consuming, operationally demanding, and difficult to integrate into PET-MRI systems due to magnetic field constraints. This work proposes an unsupervised detector alignment calibration method that estimates detector misalignments from point-source measurements with unknown source positions. The proposed approach estimates source locations using an iterative likelihood-based optimization and derives detector alignment parameters from the resulting LOR geometry, eliminating the need for externally calibrated source positioning. The method is evaluated on a simulated PET scanner and achieves translational and rotational alignment accuracies of 0.95mm and 0.41°, respectively, while the source positions are recovered with an accuracy of 0.61mm using only 3×105 LORs. By avoiding specialized calibration hardware and requiring only limited acquisition data, the proposed method enables rapid, flexible, and easily deployable PET calibration. Its low operational complexity and short acquisition time make it particularly promising for routine clinical recalibration and for hybrid imaging systems such as PET-MRI.

AcknowledgmentWe thank NVIDIA for four RTX 6000 Ada GPUs through its Grant Program.
References
[1] Sabet, Hamid, Ishii, Keizou, Matsuyama, Shigeo, Kikuchi, Youhei, Nakazawa, K., Esmaili Torshabi, Ahmad, Yamazaki, Hiromichi 2009, ‘A method to modify coordinates of detectors in positron emission tomography systems’, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 600(3), 678-682, Elsevier
[2] Pierce, Larry, Miyaoka, Robert, Lewellen, Tom, Alessio, Adam, Kinahan, Paul 2009, ‘Determining block detector positions for PET scanners’, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC), 2976-2980, IEEE
[3] Thull, Julian, Kuhl, Yannick, Mueller, Florian, Schug, David, Weissler, Bjoern, Schulz, Volkmar 2026, ‘Beyond mechanics: Maximum-likelihood-driven PET detector alignment calibration’, Medical Physics, 53.1, e70256, Wiley
Keywords: PET, unsupervised calibration, detector alignment
18:45 MIC-16-06

A Multi-Channel Positronium Decay Source Model in GATE (#2911)

M. Bała2, W. Krzemien1, K. Dulski3, W. Zdeb2, A. Coussat4

1 National Centre for Nuclear Research, Department of High Energy Physics, Otwock Swierk, Poland
2 National Centre for Nuclear Research, Department of Complex Systems, Otwock Swierk, Poland
3 Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer Science, Krakow, Poland
4 INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220,, Lyon, France

For the IMPET project

Abstract

Positronium-based imaging [1-3] requires accurate Monte Carlo modelling of positronium decay in matter.  Existing implementations in the Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission simulation framework [4-5] are limited to at most two annihilation channels, which is insufficient to represent the multi-component lifetime structures observed in biological tissues and complex materials. We present a new modular positronium decay source model implemented in both GATE versions 9.4 and 10 [5], enabling the simultaneous definition of an arbitrary number of decay channels. Each channel is independently characterised by its mean lifetime, branching fraction, annihilation multiplicity into two or three photons, and optional prompt photon emission, as required for radionuclides such as scandium-44, gallium-68, and iodine-124. The model is validated through analytical and numerical benchmarks. Branching fractions are correctly reproduced within statistical uncertainties across all tested configurations. Practical applicability is demonstrated through simulations of a NEMA Image Quality phantom filled with tissue-mimicking positronium sources representing water, fat, muscle, and bone. The implementation is fully compatible with standard simulation workflows, providing the community with the first general-purpose, multi-channel positronium decay model integrated into a widely adopted medical physics simulation framework.

AcknowledgmentThe work was supported by the Foundation for Polish Science through the FIRST TEAM FENG.02.02-IP.05-0152/23 programme co-financed by the European Union under the European Funds for Smart Economy 2021-2027 (FENG).  by the “PHC POLONIUM” program (project number: 55194PB), funded by the French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs, the French Ministry for Higher Education, Research, and Space, and the Polish NAWA (BPN/BFR/2025/1/00036/ and BPN/BAT/2025/1/00009), and co-supported by the Austrian Ministry for Women, Science and Research (project WTZ PL 11/2026).
References
[1] Hourlier, A, Boisson, F & Brasse, D 2024, 'Experimental uses of positronium and potential for biological applications', IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 581–594.
[2] Moskal, P, Baran, J, Bass, S, Choiński, J, Chug, N, Curceanu, C, Czerwiński, E, Dadgar, M, Das, M, Dulski, K, Eliyan, KV, Fronczewska, K, Gajos, A, Kacprzak, K, Kajetanowicz, M, Kaplanoglu, T, Kapłon, Ł, Klimaszewski, K, Kobylecka, M, Korcyl, G, Kozik, T, Krzemień, W, Kubat, K, Kumar, D, Kunikowska, J, Mączewska, J, Migdał, W, Moskal, G, Mryka, W, Niedźwiecki, S, Parzych, S, del Rio, EP, Raczyński, L, Sharma, S, Shivani, S, Shopa, RY, Silarski, M, Skurzok, M, Tayefi, F, Ardebili, KT, Tanty, P, Wiślicki, W, Królicki, L & Stępień, EŁ 2024, 'Positronium image of the human brain in vivo', Science Advances, vol. 10, no. 37, art. no. eadp2840.
[3] Mercolli, L, Steinberger, WM, Läppchen, T, Amon, M, Bregenzer, C, Conti, M, Cardoso, ÂRF, Mingels, C, Moskal, P, Rathod, N, Sari, H, Stępień, EŁ, Weidner, S, Rominger, A, Shi, K & Seifert, R 2026, 'In vivo voxel-wise positronium lifetime imaging of thyroid cancer using clinically routine I-124 PET/CT', EANM Innovation, vol. 2, art. no. 100017.
[4] Sarrut, D, Bała, M, Bardiès, M, Bert, J, Chauvin, M, Chatzipapas, K, Dupont, M, Etxebeste, A, Fanchon, LM, Jan, S, Kayal, G, Kirov, AS, Kowalski, P, Krzemien, W, Labour, J, Lenz, M, Loudos, G, Mehadji, B, Ménard, L, Morel, C, Papadimitroulas, P, Rafecas, M, Salvadori, J, Seiter, D, Stockhoff, M, Testa, E, Trigila, C, Pietrzyk, U, Vandenberghe, S, Verdier, MA, Visvikis, D, Ziemons, K, Zvolský, M & Roncali, E 2021, 'Advanced Monte Carlo simulations of emission tomography imaging systems with GATE', Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 66, no. 10, art. no. 10TR03.
[5] Krah, N, Arbor, N, Baudier, T, Bert, J, Chatzipapas, K, Favaretto, M, Fuchs, H, Grevillot, L, Harb, H, Van Hoey, G, Jacquet, M, Jan, S, Jia, Y, Kagadis, GC, Kang, HG, Klever, P, Kochebina, O, Krzemien, W, Maigne, L, Mohr, P, Mummaneni, G, Paneta, V, Papadimitroulas, P, Pereda, A, Rannou, A, Resch, AF, Roncali, E, Toussaint, M, Trigila, C, Tsoumpas, C, Zhang, J, Ziemons, K & Sarrut, D 2026, 'GATE 10 Monte Carlo particle transport simulation: II. Architecture and innovations', Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 71, no. 1, art. no. 015043.
Keywords: GATE, positronium lifetime imaging, positronium, monte carlo


Our Exhibitors: